Part 6 - User-driven, customer-driven and employee-driven innovation
When human knowledge becomes an innovation resource
Innovation does not necessarily occur in the research department or in the manager's office. Users and customers know needs, problems and use cases that the company does not always see. Employees encounter work processes, customers, technology and practical challenges every day. This experience-based knowledge can be a significant innovation resource. The research of Eric von Hippel and Teresa Amabile, among others, shows from different perspectives why people inside and outside the organization must be understood as active participants in innovation – not just as recipients of it.
Who knows where the problem really lies?
Traditional descriptions of innovation can give the impression of a relatively linear process. Scientists develop knowledge. Engineers develop products. The business produces them. The marketing department researches what customers want. The customer buys the finished product.
The reality is far more complex.
A person who uses a product every day can spot problems that the manufacturer never saw. A nurse can recognize weaknesses in a patient's progress that are not visible in management reports. A store employee can see the same questions from customers hundreds of times. A service technician can spot systematic errors long before they become visible in the statistics. An experienced customer can find a better way to use or modify a product.
This is knowledge.
It is not necessarily documented in research articles, databases or strategic plans. It can be experience-based, situational and difficult to formulate. But that is precisely why it can be valuable.
Innovation is therefore not just about producing new knowledge . It is also about discovering the knowledge that already exists in the people who face the problem.
Eric von Hippel – when the user becomes the innovator
Eric von Hippel at MIT has for decades challenged the notion that the manufacturer is necessarily the central source of innovation.
As early as 1976, in a study published in Research Policy, von Hippel examined 111 innovations in scientific instruments. Of the innovations that users considered to be significant functional improvements, he found that about 80 percent had been invented, prototyped, and first field-tested by users, not by manufacturers.
The manufacturers later came in with product development, production and commercialization, among other things.
This turns the traditional notion on its head.
The user doesn't just have to be a person who tells the business what she wants.
The user can be the innovator themselves.
Von Hippel's later research documented user innovation across a range of areas, from scientific instruments and software to medical devices and sports equipment. In Democratizing Innovation, he describes how both individuals and businesses that use products can themselves develop or modify solutions to meet their own needs.
User-driven innovation and user innovation are not quite the same thing
Here we should be conceptually precise.
User innovation describes situations where users themselves develop or significantly modify products, services or solutions because they have needs that existing offerings do not satisfy.
User-driven innovation is used more broadly to refer to innovation processes where knowledge about or from users actively influences the development of new solutions.
The business can observe users, conduct interviews, invite them into the development process, test prototypes with them, or study solutions that users have already developed themselves.
The difference is important.
In user innovation, the user can be the innovator .
In user-driven innovation, the business may still be the one developing the innovation, but the user's needs, experiences, behavior or ideas are a central source of knowledge.
The terms overlap, but they do not necessarily describe the same process.
Lead users – the users who live in the future
One of von Hippel's most important contributions is the theory of lead users .
In his 1986 article Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts, he described users who have needs that may later become common in the market, but who experience these needs months or years before the majority. They also have a lot to gain from finding a solution and may therefore have strong incentives to experiment and develop something new themselves.
Lead users are therefore not just the business's most loyal customers.
They are not necessarily the largest customers either. What is interesting is where they are in relation to the development of the need .
An extreme athlete may encounter equipment requirements long before regular users do. An advanced technology user may encounter limitations that only become relevant to the mass market several years later. A surgeon may develop a new way to use or modify an instrument because existing solutions do not meet a specialized clinical need.
Lead users can thus act as a kind of window into future needs.
This makes them particularly interesting in innovation work.
From asking the customer to learning from the customer
This leads us directly into the Customer universe.
Businesses have long conducted customer surveys. They ask about satisfaction, wishes, expectations, and areas for improvement. This can provide valuable knowledge.
But innovation often requires more than asking:
"What do you want?"
The customer knows their problem, but does not necessarily know which technologies or solutions are possible.
And with more radical innovation, it can be difficult to describe needs related to products or services the customer has never seen.
The business must therefore also study:
What is the customer trying to achieve?
Where does friction occur?
What detours does the customer use?
What has the customer customized?
Why does the customer use the product differently than
business expected?
What problems have the customer stopped complaining about because the customer assumes they cannot be solved?
This moves customer insights from polling to problem learning .
Customer-driven innovation
The concept of customer-driven innovation places particular emphasis on the customer as a source of knowledge in the development of products, services and customer experiences.
Customer insights can come from interviews, observation, customer service, complaints, search data, usage data, sales data, tests, customer groups, co-creation, and direct participation in development processes.
But it is important to distinguish between customer data and customer insights .
Large amounts of data do not automatically provide understanding.
A business can know exactly how many customers abandon a digital purchase process without understanding why they do so. The statistics show the behavior. Observation, conversations, or experimentation may be necessary to understand the problem.
Customer-driven innovation therefore requires both data and interpretation.
It requires people who are able to see connections between what the customer does, what the customer says and what the customer is actually trying to achieve.
From the customer to the employee
But the customer is not the only one who has the knowledge the business needs.
The employee often finds himself at the intersection between the system and reality .
The customer service representative knows which problems keep coming back.
The store employee sees where customers stop.
The production employee knows which work operations create unnecessary waiting.
The service technician sees which components are failing.
The nurse knows the transitions in the patient's course.
The teacher knows the situations in which a working method does not work.
The digital editor sees where the organization's publishing processes are causing problems.
This knowledge is part of the business's human capital .
But it does not automatically create innovation.
The organization must be able to hear it.
What is employee-driven innovation?
Employee-driven innovation means that employees' knowledge, experiences, ideas and initiatives play an active role in the development and implementation of new or significantly improved solutions.
There may be improvements to work processes.
There may be new services.
It could be product ideas.
There may be new digital solutions.
There may be organizational changes.
And the initiative does not necessarily have to come from management.
Employees can identify problems themselves and develop solutions because they work closely with the situations where needs arise.
This does not mean that every idea from an employee is innovation.
We must still stick to the definition from Part 1.
The idea must be developed and implemented before we can talk about realized innovation.
Employee-driven innovation thus primarily describes where important parts of the knowledge, initiative and development work come from .
Teresa Amabile – creativity as a prerequisite for innovation
This is where Teresa Amabile's research becomes important.
For several decades, Amabile has researched creativity in organizations and the conditions that promote or inhibit people's ability to develop new and useful ideas.
Creativity and innovation are not the same.
Creativity is about the development of new and appropriate ideas.
Innovation involves ideas actually being implemented.
But without relevant ideas, the organization has little to implement.
Amabile's research therefore makes it possible to understand the human micro-side of innovation : What does it take for people to actually use their knowledge and creativity?
It is not enough to hire talented people.
The work environment influences what they are given the opportunity and motivation to do.
Competence, creative thinking and motivation
In Amabile's component model for creativity, several factors are central, including professional competence, creative skills and motivation.
Expertise matters.
A person must understand the area well enough to see opportunities and problems.
But knowledge alone does not necessarily create creativity.
People must also be able to view problems from different perspectives, combine knowledge in new ways, and be willing to challenge established assumptions.
And motivation matters.
Amabile's research has particularly highlighted the importance of intrinsic motivation – the interest, curiosity, and satisfaction that can lie in the actual work on the problem.
This provides an important lesson for innovation management:
People cannot be treated as passive containers of expertise.
The organization must create conditions where the expertise can actually be used.
Management cannot order creativity
A manager can ask employees to be innovative.
That doesn't mean innovation occurs.
If employees lack time to investigate problems, if all mistakes are punished, if ideas are consistently stifled in the hierarchy or if people feel that their knowledge is not taken seriously, organizing an annual innovation day is of little use.
Innovativeness is therefore also about everyday life.
Do employees have room for maneuver?
Can they collaborate across borders?
Are there resources to develop the ideas?
Is constructive disagreement tolerated?
Are people given the opportunity to experiment?
Can an employee say that the current solution is not working?
And most importantly:
Does anything happen when the employee actually comes up with a good idea?
Here, employee-driven innovation begins to slip into questions of organizational culture, leadership, and psychological safety – topics we will return to when we examine the organization's innovation capacity.
Three real examples
3M and the Lead User method
3M is a particularly relevant example because von Hippel, along with Stefan Thomke and Mary Sonnack, described how the company systematically employed the Lead User method to find people and organizations that were ahead of market trends. The method was intended to help development teams find needs and solutions outside of typical customer segments.
The point wasn't just to ask existing customers what they wanted.
The teams looked for users who were already facing more advanced
needs and in some cases had developed their own solutions.
This shows the difference between traditional market analysis and user innovation.
Sometimes the knowledge of tomorrow's needs lies with people who are already trying to solve them today.
Surgical instruments and medical users
Medical technology is a classic area in von Hippel's research on user innovation.
A surgeon or other clinical expert may encounter a very specific problem repeatedly. If existing equipment does not work well enough, the user can modify the instrument themselves or develop a new solution.
Here the user has something the manufacturer often lacks:
intense and detailed experience with the actual problem in the use situation.
The manufacturer, in turn, may have expertise in product development, quality assurance, production, regulatory requirements and distribution.
When these forms of knowledge meet, we also see the connection to
Open Innovation from Part 4.
Innovation can occur because different people and organizations possess different parts of the knowledge needed .
Toyota and continuous improvements
Toyota is particularly associated with the Toyota Production System and kaizen - continuous improvement.
A key principle is that people working in production should not only perform predefined tasks. Their knowledge of the work process is also a resource for identifying problems and improvement opportunities.
The example illustrates an important aspect of employee-driven innovation:
Innovation doesn't always have to come as a large research project.
Many improvements can occur through systematic learning from the people who do the work.
Every improvement may be limited.
The sum of continuous learning and improvement can be enormous.
The customer and the employee see different parts of the same reality
This is where our Customer and Innovation universes meet directly.
The customer knows his own situation.
The employee knows the company's processes.
The customer service representative can hear the customer's problem and at the same time understand why the organization creates it.
The store employee can see both the customer's behavior and the store's limitations.
A digital advisor can analyze search data and at the same time talk to customers who can't find their way.
When these perspectives are combined, the business gains something far more powerful than a traditional customer survey.
It gives the opportunity to understand the connection between the customer's needs and the business's ability to meet them .
It is a very powerful starting point for innovation.
From customer insight to innovation
This is also why customer insights shouldn't end in a presentation.
The business can conduct the world's best customer research and still not innovate.
The insight must enter the organization.
It must be understood.
It must be discussed.
It must be linked to professional competence.
Ideas must be developed.
Solutions must be tested.
Someone has to prioritize resources.
And finally, something needs to be implemented.
We thus obtain a knowledge chain:
customer and user → experience and needs → insight → idea → development → testing → implementation → innovation.
The chain shows why both the customer and the employee are important.
The customer is aware of the problem.
The employee can rely on knowledge about how the business can solve it.
User-driven innovation and Open Innovation
The connection to Part 4 is clear.
When a business obtains ideas, solutions or knowledge from users outside the organization, user innovation can be part of an Open Innovation process.
But the concepts are not identical.
Open Innovation is broadly about consciously managed knowledge flows across organizational boundaries.
User innovation focuses attention on the user as the source or developer of innovation .
A business can conduct Open Innovation without involving users, for example through collaboration with universities or technology companies.
And a user can develop an innovation completely independent of the manufacturer.
The concepts meet when the business learns to find, understand and apply innovation that arises from users .
Von Hippel's research therefore provides an important complement to Chesbrough's.
Digitalization and AI are changing who can innovate
Digital technologies have reduced the costs of developing, testing and sharing ideas.
Software can be modified.
Digital prototypes can be built quickly.
Users can organize themselves into online communities.
Knowledge can be shared globally.
3D printing can make some physical prototypes much easier to produce.
And artificial intelligence is now further lowering the threshold for activities such as programming, analysis, design, visualization and knowledge processing.
This can have a major impact on user- and employee-driven innovation.
An employee who previously had to send a proposal to a development department can, in some cases, build a simple prototype themselves.
A customer can use available AI tools to develop a solution to their own problem.
A professional without a programming background can experiment with digital work processes.
Von Hippel's research on the democratization of innovation is therefore strikingly relevant in the AI age. MIT describes his work precisely as research on how users and user communities can become powerful engines of innovation, and his more recent work continues to examine distributed and free innovation.
But again:
Access to technology is not the same as innovation.
The solution must still be developed, evaluated and implemented.
Innovation and value creation
This section provides perhaps the clearest connection yet to the Value Creation series.
People's knowledge is a form of capital.
The customer has knowledge of their own needs.
The user has experience from the application.
The employee has professional knowledge and experience from the work processes.
The researcher has specialized knowledge.
The business has organizational resources.
When these forms of knowledge are combined, new solutions can arise.
Value creation therefore does not only lie in the technology, the patent or the capital investment.
It also lies in people's ability to discover problems, share experiences, combine knowledge and develop solutions .
This is the very core of The Invisible Capital:
A large part of the resources that make innovation possible are not necessarily listed as assets on the company's balance sheet.
They go home from work every afternoon.
And the customers and users were never on the balance sheet in the first place.
From theory to practice - BI, Oxford and San Francisco
Through Innovation and Commercialization at BI , we face the question of how ideas, needs and knowledge can be developed into solutions that are actually put into use and create value.
The Oxford Seminars represents the academic side of this picture – how research and theory can challenge established notions about where innovation comes from.
San Francisco and Silicon Valley At the same time, it shows the importance of environments where users, developers, entrepreneurs, technologists, investors and businesses meet and combine different forms of knowledge.
But the geography of innovation is less important than the principle:
The knowledge we need is often found in more people than those listed on the innovation department's organizational chart.
Copenhagen – from theory to the people in the city
And here Copenhagen fits exceptionally well as our next visual stop.
A modern city is full of users.
Cyclists use the infrastructure. Passengers use public transport. Citizens use public services.
Customers use stores, restaurants and digital services.
Employees make the systems work every day.
The city thus becomes a living laboratory for innovation.
What's interesting is not just the technology we can see.
What is interesting is people's experiences with it .
What works?
What causes problems?
What have people themselves learned?
What should have been different?
And who discovers it first?
This is precisely where user, customer and employee-driven innovation begins.
A precise professional understanding
We can therefore distinguish between three perspectives:
User-driven innovation uses knowledge about and from users' needs, experiences, behavior and usage situations as a central resource in the innovation process.
User innovation involves users themselves developing or significantly modifying solutions for their own needs.
Customer-driven innovation directs innovation efforts towards knowledge from people or businesses in the role of customers and their needs, problems and experiences.
Employee-driven innovation mobilizes employees' expertise, experience, creativity and initiative in the development and implementation of new or significantly improved solutions.
The concepts overlap.
But they all point towards the same basic realization:
Innovation is not just something businesses do for people. Innovation can also be created with people – and by people.
In short
Eric von Hippel's research challenged the notion that the manufacturer necessarily knows best what should be developed. Users can be innovators themselves, and lead users can meet tomorrow's needs long before the main market does.
Teresa Amabile's research also reminds us that the organization's own people need competence, motivation and organizational conditions that make creativity possible.
The customer knows the problem.
The user knows the usage.
The employee knows the work.
The business knows its resources and systems.
The ability to innovate increases when the organization manages to connect these forms of knowledge.
And so the next question is clear:
How does a business build an organization that actually manages to do this over and over again?
Recommended literature
Innovation is a comprehensive field of research that has developed through contributions from economics, strategy, organizational theory, entrepreneurship, technology, and research on people and organizations. For those who wish to delve deeper into the theories and concepts covered in this series, there are a number of key original works and textbooks.
Among the most important contributions are Joseph A. Schumpeter's work on innovation, entrepreneurship and creative destruction, Peter F. Drucker's research and writings on systematic innovation, Clayton M. Christensen's theory of disruptive innovation and Henry Chesbrough's work on Open Innovation. Eric von Hippel's research on user innovation and lead users provides important perspectives on the role of users, while James G. March, Michael Tushman and Charles O'Reilly have had a major impact on the understanding of exploration, exploitation and organizational ambidexterity.
Teresa Amabile's research on creativity and organizations and Amy Edmondson's research on learning and psychological safety contribute to the understanding of the human and organizational prerequisites for innovation. The OECD and Eurostat's Oslo Manual is also a key international reference for how innovation is defined, classified and measured.
Through the individual articles in the Innovation series, relevant literature and research are presented in more detail. The goal is to return to key original sources where possible, while also using more recent research to show how the theories have developed, been challenged, and are applied today.
The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth
Authors: Clayton M. Christensen and Michael E. Raynor
Short review
In this sequel to The Innovator's Dilemma, Clayton Christensen shows how businesses can translate innovation theory into practical strategy. The book explains how companies can identify new growth opportunities, develop disruptive innovations, and build organizations that thrive in rapidly changing markets.
Why we recommend the book
While The Innovator's Dilemma explains why established businesses are often challenged, The Innovator's Solution provides concrete advice on how to meet the challenges. The book is therefore a natural next step for anyone who wants to understand innovation, strategy and long-term value creation.
The Innovator's DNA: Mastering the Five Skills of Disruptive Innovators
Authors: Jeff Dyer, Hal Gregersen and Clayton M. Christensen
Short review
What characterizes people who create groundbreaking innovations? The authors identify five key skills – observation, questioning, experimentation, networking and association – that are common to the world's most innovative leaders and entrepreneurs.
Why we recommend the book
This book shifts the focus from organizations to the people behind innovation. It shows that creativity and innovation can be developed through deliberate training and experience. The perspectives align well with the philosophy behind Invisible Capital, where human competence and curiosity are the most important drivers of development.
Competing Against Luck: The Story of Innovation and Customer Choice
Authors: Clayton M. Christensen, Taddy Hall, Karen Dillon and David S. Duncan
Short review
In this book, Clayton Christensen further develops the theory of Jobs to Be Done – the idea that customers do not primarily buy products, but "hire" them to solve specific needs. Through practical examples, the authors show how businesses can develop products and services that address customers' real-world challenges.
Why we recommend the book
For anyone working in customer experience, service design, and innovation, this is one of the most insightful books ever written. It reminds us that value creation always starts with understanding the people we are developing solutions for – a fundamental principle of Invisible Capital.
The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail
Author: Clayton M. Christensen
Short review
The Innovator's Dilemma is considered one of the most influential books on innovation and technological change. Clayton M. Christensen introduces the theory of disruptive innovation and explains why even the most successful businesses can fail when new technologies and business models challenge established markets. Through a series of examples, he shows how companies often focus on today's customers and incremental improvements, while overlooking innovations that later change entire industries.
Why we recommend the book
This is one of the books that has had the greatest impact on modern innovation thinking. When I first read it, it gave me a whole new perspective on why some businesses succeed in transformation, while others lag behind – even when they are well led. The insight has been an important part of my own understanding of digitalization, innovation and change management, and many of the reflections in The Invisible Capital build on the ideas Clayton Christensen presents in this classic. The book is as relevant today, in the face of artificial intelligence and digital transformation, as it was when it was published.
Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology
Author: Henry Chesbrough
Short review
Henry Chesbrough introduced the concept of Open Innovation and changed the way many businesses think about research and development. He shows how companies can create more innovation through collaboration with customers, universities, start-ups, suppliers and other external partners.
Why we recommend the book
Open Innovation has had a major influence on modern innovation thinking and was also an important topic during the seminars in Oxford and San Francisco. The book shows why future value creation occurs in the interaction between people, businesses and knowledge environments – not within closed organizations alone.
Blue Ocean Strategy: How to Create Uncontested Market Space and Make the Competition Irrelevant
Authors: W. Chan Kim and Renée Mauborgne
Short review
Blue Ocean Strategy challenges businesses to shift their focus away from fierce competition and instead create new markets with little or no competition. The authors present strategies and models that help organizations develop innovative products, services, and business models.
Why we recommend the book
This book has inspired leaders around the world to rethink strategy and innovation. Instead of competing for the same customers, it shows how businesses can create new value through creativity and differentiation. The perspectives align very well with the themes of innovation, digitalization, and long-term value creation in Invisible Capital.
Outside Innovation: How Your Customers Will Co-Design Your Company's Future
Authors: Patricia B. Seybold
Short review
Patricia Seybold shows how businesses can create better products and services by actively involving customers in the innovation process. The book describes how dialogue, co-creation and close collaboration with users can provide better solutions and stronger competitiveness.
Why we recommend the book
Customers often hold the most important insights into how products and services can be improved. This book emphasizes the importance of listening, involving, and learning from users – a perspective that is echoed in many of the articles on The Invisible Capital. Innovation rarely happens alone; it is created in the interaction between people.
Blown to Bits: How the New Economics of Information Transforms Strategy
Authors: Philip Evans and Thomas S. Wurster
Short review
This book analyzes how digital information is changing competitive conditions, markets, and business strategies. The authors explain how the internet is disrupting established structures and creating new opportunities for businesses that are able to think differently.
Why we recommend the book
Although written early in the internet revolution, the book describes many of the developments that still characterize business today. It provides valuable perspective on how digitalization affects value chains, competition, and innovation – themes that are central to Invisible Capital.
Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything
Authors: Don Tapscott and Anthony D. Williams
Short review
Wikinomics shows how openness, sharing and collaboration across organizations create new forms of innovation and value creation. Through a number of international examples, the authors describe how digital networks make it possible to develop products, services and knowledge together.
Why we recommend the book
This book was groundbreaking when it was first published, and many of the ideas have since become a natural part of everyday digital life. The perspectives on collaboration, knowledge sharing, and open innovation processes align very well with the philosophy behind Invisible Capital, where people and networks are at the center of value creation.
The Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
Author(s): Author: Michael E. Porter
Short review
Competitive Strategy is Michael E. Porter's classic work on how companies can understand the competition they find themselves in and develop a position that provides a basis for long-term profitability. Porter shifts the focus from the individual competitor to the structure of the entire industry and shows how competition is affected by customers, suppliers, new entrants, substitutes and the rivalry between existing companies. This forms the basis for what has later become known as Porter's Five Forces. The book is also about how companies can choose a competitive strategy on the basis of this analysis. It thus established an analytical language for strategy that has gained great importance in both research, teaching and practical strategy work.
Why we recommend the book
We recommend Competitive Strategy because it provides the analytical foundation for much of the thinking Porter later develops in What Is Strategy?. If a company is to choose a unique strategic position, it must also understand the competitive forces, the industry structure and the factors that affect the ability to create and retain value. The book is particularly useful because it reminds us that strategy is not just about internal goals, plans and ambitions. Strategy must be developed in the face of customers, competitors, suppliers, technology and structural changes in the market. Together with What Is Strategy?, the book therefore provides a much richer picture: First, the company must understand the competitive arena. Then, it must choose how to be different.
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Author(s): Author: Michael E. Porter
Short review
In Competitive Advantage, Porter moves the analysis from the industry to the business itself. The main question is how competitive advantage is actually created. One of the book's most important contributions is the value chain, where the business is understood as a system of activities that collectively develop, produce, market, deliver and support a product or service. Competitive advantage cannot therefore be understood only through products or overall strategies; one must examine the activities that create costs, differentiation and value. This understanding later becomes central to Porter's argument about strategic fit: the activities must not only be good in isolation, but also fit together and reinforce each other.
Why we recommend the book
We recommend Competitive Advantage because it brings strategy right down to where value is actually created: in the activities the business performs. This makes the book particularly relevant together with What Is Strategy?. When Porter argues in 1996 that strategy consists of performing different activities than competitors, or performing similar activities in other ways, this builds on the thinking he developed here. For our perspective on value creation, this is particularly interesting. Value does not arise because the business has formulated a strategy on a document, but through people, expertise, technology, processes, collaboration and activities that together enable the business to create something that customers value. The book therefore provides an important connection between strategy, competitive advantage and actual value creation.
The Competitive Advantage of Nations
Author(s): Author: Michael E. Porter
Short review
In The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Porter raises the perspective from business to countries, regions and business environments. The book is based on extensive studies of the competitiveness of ten leading trading nations and examines why certain countries and business clusters are particularly successful in certain industries. A central premise is that national prosperity is not simply something a country inherits through natural resources or other given conditions. It is created, and productivity, innovation, competence, competition and the quality of the environment in which businesses operate are crucial. Here, Porter also develops the well-known diamond model to explain how different national and regional conditions can interact and stimulate competitiveness.
Why we recommend the book
We recommend The Competitive Advantage of Nations because here Porter extends the strategy perspective to the ecosystem surrounding the business itself. Value creation does not occur in a vacuum. Businesses develop in societies with education, research, infrastructure, capital, suppliers, demanding customers, competing businesses and public institutions. This makes the book particularly interesting for understanding value creation as an interaction between people, businesses and society. It also provides an important corrective to the notion that a country's competitiveness can mainly be understood through low costs or access to natural resources. Innovation, productivity and the ability to continuously develop are far more central to Porter's explanation.
Understanding Michael Porter: The Essential Guide to Competition and Strategy
Author: Joan Magretta
Short review
Understanding Michael Porter brings together and explains the most important parts of Michael Porter's strategic thinking in one accessible whole. Joan Magretta herself worked on strategy at the Harvard Business Review and organizes Porter's ideas around two fundamental questions: What is competition, and what is strategy? She explains, among other things, the Five Forces, competitive advantage, the value chain, value creation, trade-offs, fit, and strategic continuity. This makes the connection between Porter's various works clearer than when the concepts are studied separately. The book also includes an interview with Porter.
Why we recommend the book
We recommend Understanding Michael Porter because it helps the reader see the whole picture of Porter's understanding of strategy. Porter is often reduced to the Five Forces or a few models used in isolation. Magretta shows why this is too simple. Competition, value creation, strategic positioning, trade-offs, activity systems, fit and continuity are interconnected. This makes the book a particularly good supplement after reading What Is Strategy?. It makes it easier to understand why Porter does not view strategy as a plan or a collection of goals, but as a coherent system of choices about how the business will create value and compete over time.
HBR's 10 Must Reads on Strategy
Authors: Harvard Business Review, Michael E. Porter, W. Chan Kim, Renée A. Mauborgne and more
Short review
HBR's 10 Must Reads on Strategy brings together some of Harvard Business Review's most influential writings on strategy. The original collection from 2011 features Michael E. Porter's What Is Strategy? as its main article and combines it with works on competitive forces, Blue Ocean Strategy, the organization's vision, business models, strategy execution, and the Balanced Scorecard, among others. The result is not one unified theory of strategy, but multiple perspectives on how organizations can develop, formulate, and execute strategy.
Why we recommend the book
We recommend HBR's 10 Must Reads on Strategy because it places Porter in a broader strategic context. After reading What Is Strategy?, it will be interesting to encounter other central perspectives and see how they complement, challenge, or extend Porter's understanding. The collection also shows why strategy cannot be reduced to a single model. Competitive position, choice, innovation, business model, execution, priorities, and measurement must be seen in context. For the reader who wants to move on from Porter and into the strategy discipline more generally, this is therefore a very good introduction.
Creating a Learning Society: A New Approach to Growth, Development, and Social Progress
Author: Joseph E. Stiglitz and Bruce C. Greenwald
Short review:
Creating a Learning Society examines how knowledge, learning, and technological development contribute to economic growth and long-term value creation. Joseph E. Stiglitz and Bruce C. Greenwald challenge the notion that economic development is primarily about accumulating more physical capital. They argue that society’s ability to create, disseminate, and apply knowledge is crucial to productivity growth and improved living standards. A key point is that learning does not only occur in schools and universities. It also occurs in businesses, through work, production, innovation, and the interaction between people and organizations. Knowledge can also spread from one business and one part of the economy to others.
The book thus provides an important perspective on why human capital, competence, innovation and learning must be understood as central parts of a society's ability to create value over time.
Why we recommend the book
We recommend Creating a Learning Society because it expands the understanding of what lies behind economic value creation.
Machines, technology and financial capital are important, but they do not create productivity growth alone. Behind the development are people who learn, develop knowledge, improve work processes, share experiences and find new solutions.
This makes the book particularly relevant to Invisible Capital and our perspective on value creation: A significant part of society's value-creating capacity is found in the knowledge, competence, and learning ability of the people who participate in the economy.
Stiglitz and Greenwald thus provide an academic foundation for one of the most important relationships in modern value creation:
The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy
Author: Mariana Mazzucato
Short review
In The Value of Everything, Mariana Mazzucato asks a fundamental question: What exactly is value – and who creates it? Mazzucato returns to the historical discussions of value in economics and shows how the understanding of value creation has changed. She challenges the notion that high income, high prices or large profits necessarily mean that correspondingly large values have been created. One of the book's most important contributions is the distinction between value creation and value extraction . Mazzucato examines the financial sector, the pharmaceutical industry, innovation and the public sector, among others, and argues that we must become better at distinguishing between activities that actually create new values, and activities that primarily extract values that have already been created.
The book also challenges the traditional notion that the private sector creates value while the public sector mainly consumes or redistributes it. Innovation and economic development often arise through a complex interaction between public investment, research, businesses, capital and people.
The Power of Creative Destruction: Economic Upheaval and the Wealth of Nations
Author: Philippe Aghion, Céline Antonin and Simon Bunel
Short review
The Power of Creative Destruction is about one of the most important drivers of long-term economic growth: innovation.
Philippe Aghion, Céline Antonin and Simon Bunel build on Joseph Schumpeter's classic idea of "creative destruction" – the process by which new technologies, businesses, products and ideas challenge and replace existing solutions.
But the book is not just about the disappearance of the old. The authors examine why some economies manage to create continuous innovation and productivity growth, while others stagnate. Competition, entrepreneurship, research, education, institutions and public policy thus become important parts of the explanation.
Creative destruction also comes at a cost. New technologies and businesses create opportunities and jobs, but can also make existing skills, tasks and business models less relevant. The challenge is therefore to create societies that both promote innovation and enable people to participate in the transition.
Why we recommend the book
We recommend The Power of Creative Destruction because it shows why innovation is a fundamental driver of value creation .
Value creation is not just about producing more of what we already produce. It also occurs when people develop new ideas, technology, and ways of working that enable us to solve tasks better than before.
This makes the book particularly relevant to The Invisible Capital. Behind innovation are people with knowledge, expertise, creativity and experience. But Aghion's perspective also shows that human capital must be part of a larger system where competition, institutions, research, investment and policy create the conditions for new ideas to actually turn into economic and social development.
The book thus provides an important context in our understanding of value creation:
Knowledge → new ideas → innovation → productivity growth → long-term value creation.
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance
Author: Philippe Aghion, Céline Antonin and Simon Bunel
Short review
Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance is one of Douglass C. North's most important works on why some societies are more successful than others in creating economic development over time.
North shifts attention from traditional factors of production such as capital and labor to the institutions that shape how people, businesses, and governments act and cooperate. Institutions are society's formal and informal rules of the game – including laws, regulations, norms, traditions, and established ways of organizing interaction.
These rules of the game affect the incentives that people and organizations face. They also affect investments, knowledge development, cooperation, transaction costs, and which economic activities emerge.
North also shows that institutions develop over time. History therefore matters: Today's economic opportunities are influenced by institutional choices and development paths that can stretch far back in time.
Why we recommend the book
We recommend Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance because it explains a crucial aspect of value creation that easily becomes invisible:
Value creation needs good rules of the game.
People may have knowledge. Businesses may have capital. Entrepreneurs may have great ideas. A society may have natural resources and advanced technology. But outcomes are also influenced by the institutions that determine how people can collaborate, invest, compete, make deals, and develop businesses.
This makes North particularly interesting for our understanding of trust as part of invisible capital. Trust is not the same as institutions, but stable rules of the game, credible agreements, and well-functioning institutions can reduce uncertainty and make economic interaction easier.
North thus gives us another important part of the value creation picture:
Institutions → predictability and incentives → cooperation and investment → productive activity → long-term value creation.
© 2025 - 2026 Portico Publish | The invisible capital Privacy and use of the website | Developed and operated by Magne Bjella | Powered and secured by Wix
Comments